April 28 HOA Meeting Agenda Concerns: For more information, please visit the Community Updates Page
Welcome to the Stetson Hills Common Good (SHCG) Community Updates page. This is where we will post updates about what is happening with the Stetson Hills HOA and key SHCG efforts and actions taken to promote transparent, lawful, sensible, and homeowner focused HOA operations. The goal is to help neighbors stay informed with timely updates and to support SHCG’s commitment to transparency, inclusion, and fact-based communication.
Our Standard: When SHCG reports a concern, we aim to include supporting source material whenever possible, such as agendas, minutes, notices, budgets, governing document excerpts, and written or recorded communications. If we publish something that is later shown to be inaccurate, we will promptly correct it. To date, we have not been presented with any documented inaccuracies in what we have published.
This is your community. Remember, informed homeowners are the foundation of accountable governance.
Note: it is important to understand that solutions to HOA issues may involve homeowners using legal remedies available under Arizona law and the Stetson Hills HOA governing documents. For that reason, there may be situations where sensitive details are not posted publicly, or are summarized at a high level, in order to protect homeowner privacy, preserve legal rights, and avoid undermining ongoing efforts to bring necessary change to our community.
Tuesday’s Stetson Hills HOA Board meeting is an important one. The Board plans to fill two open director seats, ratify the March 24 bylaws repeal, and consider whether homeowner voting rights may be suspended for open violations.
Please plan to attend and speak up respectfully if you have concerns.
Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Time: 6:00 p.m.
Location: Zoom
Meeting link: https://meeting.cityproperty.com/STTB854423
Full Board Packet Link (The full April 28 Board packet, as distributed by the HOA to all members through the homeowner portal, is available here for convenience.)
Why This Meeting Is Important
Six neighbors applied for the two open Board seats:
Michelle Burgess, Robert Biscoe, Thomas McDaniel, Stephen Weisberg, Jim Livas, and Brian Noel.
Four applicants are part of the SHCG slate of neighbors ready to serve: Robert Biscoe, Michelle Burgess, Thomas McDaniel, and Stephen Weisberg. Their bios and contact information are available on the Board Candidate Page.
One appointment issue deserves special attention.
Jim Livas, the candidate many homeowners raised concerns about at last month's meeting, is on the slate again. By his own statements, he is not a full-time Arizona resident and is physically present in Stetson Hills approximately 5.5 to 6 months per year, with legal residence outside Arizona.
Board members make decisions that affect property rights, assessments, enforcement, architectural rules, common areas, neighborhood appearance, and everyday quality of life. Neighbors who live here year-round live with those decisions every day, are easier to reach, and are directly accountable to the community they represent.
That is why this Board previously adopted a full-time residency requirement. Then, at the March 24 meeting, the Board voted to repeal those residency and eligibility safeguards. Now, just weeks later, Mr. Livas is being considered again, even though multiple full time resident candidates are available.
Mr. Livas’s ARC record also deserves attention. In his application, he points to his work on the ARC, including updates to community paint schemes and Design Guidelines. Many homeowners remember him as one of the lead ARC members involved in the recent paint palette process, including the proposal that would have prevented many homeowners from simply keeping their existing exterior paint colors.
That position did not change until after SHCG conducted its own community paint survey which showed strong opposition to taking away existing paint color options. Only then did the final rules allow homeowners to keep their current colors.
The March 24 minutes state that the 2026 bylaws amendment discussion was tabled. But the Board then made and passed a motion to repeal the January 2024 and November 2025 amendments and revert to the March 2023 version. Bruce Hopkin and Anthony Vasquez voted no.
Immediately after the vote, the community manager recommended that the bylaws be reviewed by legal counsel and that a redline version be prepared to ensure compliance with Arizona statutes. That recommendation is in the March 24 minutes.
Five weeks later, the Board plans to ratify that repeal on April 28. Homeowners still have not seen a clean current version of the bylaws, and if the legal review the manager recommended has been completed, it has not been shared with the community. The Board should not ratify a confusing repeal before homeowners can see what the current bylaws actually say.
Agenda item VI.f says: “Voting Rights, May suspend for open violations.”
Voting is one of the most important rights homeowners have. Any policy that would allow the Board to suspend a homeowner’s voting rights deserves careful scrutiny before it is adopted.
The governing documents and Arizona law raise serious questions about how far the Board can go. The Stetson Hills Bylaws reference suspension of voting rights as a possible sanction, but also say the duration of any suspension is limited by the Declaration. The CC&R provision addressing suspensions appears to focus on the right to use recreational facilities, including 60-day suspension periods for infractions. That is not the same as a broad policy suspending homeowner voting rights for any “open violation,” especially one that is only alleged or still in dispute.
Arizona law also requires notice and an opportunity to be heard before monetary penalties are imposed. At a minimum, any voting-rights suspension policy should include clear notice, a fair hearing process, and a meaningful opportunity to challenge or correct the alleged violation before such an important right is limited.
Homeowners do not vote on the appointments, the bylaws ratification, or any voting rights policy. The current Board members make those decisions.
But homeowners do have a voice.
Please attend the April 28 meeting and respectfully make your views known during homeowner comments before any vote. The only way to ensure the Board hears the community clearly is for homeowners to show up and participate.
The decisions made Tuesday could affect who represents us, what bylaws govern the Board, and whether homeowner voting rights can be limited in the future. These are not small issues, and they should not be decided quietly.
Thank you for staying engaged and continuing to show up for Stetson Hills. Homeowners are making a difference.
The Stetson Hills HOA is seeking homeowners to fill two open positions on the seven-member Board of Directors. The Board is expected to make the appointments at its April 28, 2026 meeting, and those selected would serve the remainder of the terms ending May 20, 2028.
In addition to these two open seats, two more Board seats are scheduled to be filled by election in May, making this an especially important time for homeowners who want to get involved and help shape the future of our community.
According to the announcement, eligible candidates must be a legal owner of record or the spouse of an owner. Board members should be willing to uphold the Association’s CC&Rs, Bylaws, and Conduct and Ethics policies, thoughtfully consider community matters, attend Board and committee meetings, and communicate effectively with homeowners.
If you have been thinking about getting involved, this is an important opportunity to serve the community.
Interested homeowners are asked to submit a brief 100 to 150 word statement describing their qualifications and interest in serving to Community Manager Toby Metzger at toby.metzger@cityproperty.com.
Also, if you would like to be included on the SHCG slate of candidates or learn more about others who have expressed interest in serving, please visit the HOA Board Candidates page.
Thank you for staying engaged and helping build a stronger, more transparent Stetson Hills.
City Property sent out the official announcement today for the 2026 Stetson Hills HOA Annual Meeting and Board election.
At this year’s annual meeting, 2 Board seats will be up for election, each for a 3 year term. Homeowners who want to run for the Board must submit their name, lot number, and a short paragraph about their qualifications no later than April 20, 2026 at 5:00 PM Arizona time.
Candidate information must be submitted to:
Email: meetings@cityproperty.com
Mail: 4645 E. Cotton Gin Loop, Phoenix, AZ 85040
City Property stated that resumes sent to any other email address will not be included on the ballot.
Candidate information may also be submitted through the CITYCYNC homeowner portal: https://homeowners.cityproperty.com
This election is especially important given the recent Board resignations and the opportunity now in front of the community. We strongly encourage qualified, homeowner focused residents to consider running.
Based on the current governing documents, the key qualification to run appears to be that you are a Member of the Association at the time of election. The later bylaw provisions requiring full time Arizona residency, current account financial status, no outstanding violations, and other added eligibility restrictions were repealed.
If you are thinking about running and would like to be included on the SHCG candidate slate, or if you would like to review the candidates currently endorsed by SHCG, please visit the HOA Board Candidate Page.
Stetson Hills homeowners should be aware of another major development at the HOA.
Board members Leon Lang and Christine Wirthwein have both resigned from the Stetson Hills HOA Board. Their resignations come on the heels of Brian Lewis’s resignation, meaning that 3 of the 7 Board members resigned within the last week.
We thank Leon, Christine, and Brian for their service to the community and for the time they each devoted to the Board.
At the same time, this is a significant and very positive development for our community.
For many homeowners, these resignations reflect the growing pressure for change and the increasing difficulty of defending a system that has too often operated without the transparency, fairness, and accountability homeowners deserve. Brian Lewis’s seat has already been filled, but these new resignations still leave important vacancies on the Board at the same time that 2 Board seats are already up for election in May. That means homeowners need to keep the pressure on the remaining Board members to make sure the right candidates are appointed to these open seats.
This is a major opening for Stetson Hills to break from the old pattern and build a Board that is more open, more inclusive, more accountable, and more responsive to homeowners.
Who gets appointed to these open seats, and who gets elected in May, will help determine how quickly that happens. But one thing is already clear: this community is no longer willing to accept the same closed, insider-driven approach that has frustrated so many homeowners. We are headed toward something better, and more homeowners are stepping up to help make sure of it.
This is why homeowner involvement matters right now more than ever. This is a big moment for our 904-home community. The opportunity is here, we just need to keep the momentum going.
Stetson Hills Common Good continues to encourage qualified homeowners to step forward and get involved. We need strong candidates for both Board and committee positions. If you want a voice in the future of our community, now is the time to stay informed, stay engaged, and consider stepping up.
Visit the HOA Board Candidates page to see the current slate of qualified and experienced candidates. There is also a candidate interest form for homeowners who would like to be added to the SHCG slate of candidates for Board or committee positions.
Our community is moving in a more positive, more inclusive direction, and homeowners are the reason why.
Last night’s HOA Board meeting drew another record-breaking turnout, with nearly 70 homeowners in attendance. That level of engagement was incredible, and it made a real difference.
Unfortunately, the meeting itself was once again chaotic, argumentative, and not reflective of the kind of leadership this community deserves. It lasted more than two and a half hours, and because the Board President struggled to run an organized meeting, much of the agenda was tabled. Homeowners who attended saw firsthand the urgent need for better leadership and a more functional Board.
Still, there were some important developments.
Melissa Bowman appointed to the open Board seat
The best news of the night was that, after many homeowner comments and repeated efforts by certain Board members to appoint a part-time Stetson Hills resident to the open seat, four of the six Board members did the right thing and appointed full-time resident Melissa Bowman to the vacant Board position.
Board members Leon Lang and Kevin Beckwith voted against her appointment.
Melissa is highly qualified and will be an outstanding Board member who brings a much-needed focus on transparency, accountability, and putting the community first.
Bylaw changes: some needed fixes, but bigger concerns remain
There was also major action on the bylaws. A couple of the changes were needed. Removing the Nominating Committee complications and easing some of the homeowner-violation restrictions on running for a Board seat were both positive steps.
But that was not the whole story.
After Leon Lang learned that his preferred candidate was not going to be appointed because that candidate was not a full-time Arizona resident, he pushed for a motion to repeal the very bylaws that created that obstacle. His ally had also just lost a Board seat under the three-consecutive-meetings rule after failing to attend the last three consecutive Board meetings. Those two setbacks appear to have been the real catalyst for the sudden effort to abandon the agendized bylaw proposal and instead repeal the last two bylaw amendments.
As a result, the Board removed:
the requirement that Board members be full-time Arizona residents
the rule that a Board member who misses three consecutive Board meetings is automatically removed
the automatic vacancy rule if a director no longer meets certain qualifications
the rule making the Nominating Committee the sole and exclusive method for Board nominations
A few needed fixes were mixed in, but the overall intent appeared to be less about thoughtful reform and more about eliminating the two provisions that had suddenly become inconvenient for insider candidates: the three-consecutive-meetings rule and the full-time-resident requirement.
How it happened was just as troubling
What makes this even more troubling is how it happened. The Board packet included a bylaw revision, and there was clear confusion during the meeting about the motion process. But instead of carefully working through the proposed language and its impact, the Board ultimately voted to set aside the proposed bylaw changes and repeal the last two bylaw revisions from 2024 and 2025 in their entirety, reverting to the baseline bylaws from 1998, along with amendments through 2023.
There was little meaningful discussion of what those repeals would actually do, and it did not appear that most Board members clearly understood the consequences before voting. It looked like a last-minute scramble to change the rules when the existing rules no longer worked for certain insiders, and it was done in a way that left everyone in attendance, including much of the Board itself, confused about what had just happened.
Homeowners are making a difference
Even with all the dysfunction, homeowners should not miss the bigger picture: we are making a difference.
A full-time resident was appointed to the open Board seat. The paint palette was changed so homeowners can keep their current home color. Homeowners are now being allowed to speak before Board votes. More neighbors are getting informed, showing up, and refusing to be divided.
That matters, and it is starting to change outcomes.
What comes next
Two more Board seats will be up for election in May. Please visit the HOA Candidate page for more information and to see the current slate of SHCG-endorsed HOA Board and committee candidates.
Please also consider throwing your name in the hat. We need more neighbors to step up and help restore our HOA Board to one that acts lawfully, reasonably, fairly, and in the best interests of the entire community.
Thank you to everyone who attended, spoke up, sent emails, shared information, and stayed engaged. Progress only happens when neighbors come together and keep pushing for a Board that is transparent, reasonable, fair, and accountable.
HOA Board Bylaw Links:
Bylaw Amendment - 2024 - REPEALED ON MARCH 24, 2026, BY BOARD
Bylaw Amendment - 2025 - REPEALED ON MARCH 24, 2026, BY BOARD
The March 24 HOA Board agenda was posted on Friday (link to agenda).
Update quick summary: The agenda is vague yet again. Homeowners should be prepared for a possible vote on the open Board seat, continued questions about how the Nominating Committee is handling the vacancy process, more developments on the Permanent Lighting issue, and discussion of other long-awaited items including possible Landscape Committee formation and needed playground equipment repairs. The email also includes SHCG’s endorsement of Melissa Bowman for the current Board opening and information about this spring’s Board elections. Please take a few minutes to read the rest of this update, which includes important details on each of these issues.
Once again, the agenda does not clearly state whether the Board plans to discuss or vote on the soon-to-be-open Board seat, so homeowners should be on the watch for possible action anyway. In our view, this continues a pattern of agendas that are too vague to give homeowners fair notice of what the Board may actually do, which does not align with state law.
That lack of clarity is especially important here. Article 4, Section 4.1 of the Stetson Hills Bylaws, as amended in November 2025 (link to Bylaw), requires that any person desiring to serve on the Board must be a Member of the Association and a full-time resident of the State of Arizona. The bylaws also include an exception to the full-time residency requirement in situations involving a shortage of fully qualified candidates. But any such exception should be reserved for rare circumstances where there truly are not enough qualified full-time homeowner candidates. That does not appear to be the case here. For this vacancy, three full-time Stetson Hills homeowners have already stepped forward and, according to City Property, all three have been verified as qualified for appointment. Even so, certain members of the Nominating Committee still attempted to exclude two of those candidates, despite the community manager’s explanation that their reasoning is flawed and that both candidates are fully qualified and in good standing.
If qualified full-time resident candidates have already stepped forward, why is a part-time resident, who currently serves on the Stetson Hills HOA Architectural Committee, still being pushed for the seat?
Even more concerning, that push seems to be coming from the Nominating Committee, which is supposed to ensure that candidates are qualified and that the governing documents are followed. One of the three members of that committee is the same Board member who is resigning from the seat now being filled. At a minimum, those are reasonable questions about whether the process is being handled fairly and independently.
Taken together, these facts make the effort to appoint a part-time homeowner feel less like a rare exception for a shortage of qualified full-time homeowner candidates and more like a convenient way to keep a preferred insider in place. These Board decisions affect all of us. We deserve Board members who live here year-round, understand our community, and reflect our neighborhood’s diversity in age, background, and perspective.
The great news is that we have strong candidates ready to serve. Stetson Hills Common Good is proud to endorse Melissa Bowman for the open Board seat, which the Board has described as the Treasurer position. Her experience, professionalism, and commitment to fairness make her the clear choice. More broadly, homeowners are stepping up in a positive way to help restore reasonableness, common sense, lawfulness, and a homeowner-first approach to the Stetson Hills HOA Board.
We have included a link to SHCG’s endorsement of Melissa Bowman for the current Board opening.
There is also another important item on the March 24 agenda: Permanent Lighting. As many of you know, last month the Board voted to seek legal guidance on the permanent eave holiday lights issue and to freeze violations related to those lights while that review is underway. Homeowners should listen closely for any update on that legal research, what questions were sent to counsel, and what the Board plans to do next.
This issue deserves close attention because permanent eave holiday lights are already allowed under the current CC&Rs, and the Board’s own retained architect reportedly said the same. We asked for a legal opinion months ago, but instead the Board hired an architect to review what the CC&Rs already allow. Now, after not getting the answer they wanted from the architect, the Board is finally seeking legal guidance while spending more HOA dues revisiting an issue that already appears settled.
The latest agenda also includes two items many homeowners have been waiting to see: Landscape Committee Formation and needed playground equipment repairs/replacements. We are encouraged that the Landscape Committee may finally be resurrected after being disbanded months ago, especially given the many homeowner complaints about the declining condition of our common areas. When our landscaping and shared spaces suffer, it affects property values, but just as importantly, it weakens the sense of pride, connection, and community those spaces are supposed to create.
We have included a link for homeowners to review the current contract with Stillwater Landscaping, the landscape maintenance company hired by our HOA board.
The playground item is just as important. The equipment is overdue for real repair and restoration, and its condition has become a visible blight on the neighborhood. For safety, liability, and, most importantly, for the enjoyment of our children and families, this equipment needs to be professionally repaired and maintained.
This is your HOA, and your voice matters. Please attend the next HOA Board meeting on March 24 at 6:00 PM via Zoom: https://meeting.cityproperty.com/STTB604222
Also remember that our HOA will hold its annual elections in May, with two Board seats up for election. To learn more about the neighbors stepping up as HOA Board candidates, please visit the HOA Board Candidates Page.
The issues on the March 24 agenda point to something bigger: whether Stetson Hills will be guided by transparency, fairness, sound judgment, and real accountability to homeowners. From the Board vacancy, to the Permanent Lighting issue, to the condition of our common areas and playgrounds, homeowners deserve thoughtful leadership and responsible decision-making. We encourage the Board to keep those principles in mind and to put fairness, community representation, and common sense first.
Let’s work to bring back an HOA Board that is fair, transparent, homeowner-focused, and truly representative of our community by supporting Melissa Bowman on March 24 and voting for new, qualified, and dedicated members in our May elections.
Thanks for caring and staying engaged.
Document Links:
The next Stetson Hills HOA Board meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 24 at 6:00 p.m. via Zoom. This is an important meeting, and we encourage homeowners to attend and stay engaged.
City Property meeting link: https://meeting.cityproperty.com/STTB604222
A few key agenda items or discussion topics may include:
Open Board Position (Treasurer)
The Board may take action on filling the open Treasurer seat. Stetson Hills Common Good is endorsing Melissa Bowman for the position. You can read Melissa’s bio on the SHCG website candidates page: https://www.stetsonhillscommongood.com/hoa-board-candidates
SHCG Bowman Endorsement: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IHfhoTKuklzeIONyYRLu-zL7raS_hIH0/view?usp=sharing
Ethics Complaint Review Committee
There may also be discussion about creating a committee to review the ethics complaint filed against Board Secretary Kevin Beckwith. One Board officer’s conduct toward a homeowner during the HOA Board meeting on February 24, 2026 appeared inconsistent with the standards set out in the Association’s own Code of Conduct and Ethics Policy.
This matters because when Board officers use their position to intimidate or publicly shame homeowners, it discourages participation and undermines trust in the Association’s governance. No homeowner should feel pressured into silence simply for participating. That kind of conduct should be addressed promptly and appropriately.
HOA Board Code of Conduct and Ethics Policy:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_Kz1Whi8gALiQzfBWKmTn5yjBhSrtAnC/view?usp=sharing
Voting Rights / “Good Standing” Discussion
Another important issue to watch is the Board’s discussion about voting rights and “good standing,” including concepts tied to violations. Homeowners raised concerns that any attempt to block members from voting, or from running for the Board, based on minor, disputed, or unresolved violations would be unfair, inconsistent with the governing documents, and harmful to homeowner participation. This topic needs clarity, transparency, and due process, not broad discretion.
Permanent Holiday Lighting
There may also be an update regarding the Board’s February 24 action placing a hold on enforcement of violations related to permanent holiday eave lighting pending a final outcome on the legal issues surrounding this topic.
These issues show why it is so important for homeowners to continue attending meetings, paying attention, and speaking up. Decisions being made now could affect homeowner rights, participation, enforcement, and the overall direction of the community.
To join the March 24 Board meeting, use this Zoom link: https://meeting.cityproperty.com/STTB604222
Community Event Reminder
Stetson Hills owners and residents are also invited to a free community cookout on Saturday, March 28, from noon to 3:00 p.m. at the large park across from Stetson Hills Elementary School. Hamburgers, hot dogs, water, and soft drinks will be provided by the Association’s landscaper, Stillwater Landscape Management, LLC. According to the Association, this get-together is being held in response to strong homeowner interest shown in last fall’s community survey.
The cookout also coincides with the annual Stetson Hills Spring Garage Sale, which will be held Friday, March 27 and Saturday, March 28, from 7:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. each day.
We hope to see homeowners at the Board meeting and out in the community that weekend.
Thank you to everyone who attended the Stetson Hills HOA Board meeting last night, February 24. We had more than 40 homeowners in attendance again.
Overall, the meeting was disorganized, with unclear framing of several agenda items and a lot of time spent reacting in the moment instead of working through a clear, predictable process. That said, thank you to President Saigh for allowing homeowners to speak and for keeping the meeting open to member comments.
A special thank you as well to Board member and ARC Chair Bruce Hopkin for his overview of the proposed paint palette changes and for sharing his research and perspective on why the CC&Rs already allow permanent holiday eave lighting in our community. Bruce and the ARC members also referenced the SHCG paint survey results and used that homeowner input to make adjustments in the final paint rules. We strongly recommend the Board engage homeowners in this same way in the future, especially for major design changes, large financial purchases, and other significant community decisions, before final decisions are made.
Key takeaways from the Zoom meeting:
Tone and conduct
There were moments where the discussion became personal and unproductive. It is ethically wrong for any Board officer to disparage, ridicule, or intimidate homeowners for asking questions or raising legitimate concerns. Open meetings are for listening, transparency, and respectful dialogue, not personal attacks or attempts to silence participation.
One Board officer’s conduct toward a homeowner during the meeting crossed that line and appeared inconsistent with the standards set out in the Association’s own Code of Conduct and Ethics Policy. This matters because beyond being disrespectful, when Board officers use their position to intimidate or publicly shame homeowners, it discourages others from speaking up and undermines trust in the integrity of the Association’s governance. No homeowner should be pressured into silence simply for participating. This behavior should be corrected immediately.
“Voting” agenda item and “good standing” discussion
The Board discussed voting and “voting rights,” including concepts tied to violations. Homeowners raised concerns that any attempt to block members from voting, or to block homeowners from running for the Board, based on minor, disputed, or unresolved violations would be unfair, inconsistent with the governing documents, and could chill homeowner participation. This topic needs clarity, transparency, and due process, not broad discretion. This is a topic to watch very closely.
ARC related items, including paint palette changes
The ARC and Board discussed ongoing architectural and enforcement topics, including the continuing controversy around permanent lighting and the broader concern about “guidelines” being used or changed in ways that go beyond what is clearly written in the CC&Rs. Homeowners again asked for consistent and reasonable standards, predictable approvals, and transparent decision making.
A compliance freeze for permanent holiday eave lighting was approved pending a final outcome regarding the legalities surrounding this topic. The new paint rules were also modified to allow existing home colors to remain, and that change was driven directly by the volume and consistency of homeowner feedback, including the 137 SHCG paint survey responses.
Insurance renewal
The 2026 insurance policies were renewed at a cost of roughly $25,000. No alternative bids were received, and no details were shared with homeowners prior to the meeting.
Committee reappointments
The Board, once again, appointed community members to two Board committees, the Review Committee and Nominating Committee, without any community-wide notice or advertisement regarding vacancies.
Landscaper updates
Stillwater Landscaping was not in attendance and did not provide a monthly update again this month, which was also the case in January. President Saigh noted he reached out to the superintendent but did not get a response and that Stillwater may be busy with other clients.
Next steps and transparency
Homeowners asked for clearer agendas, advance posting of draft resolutions or policies before votes, and better documentation for major decisions. If the Board is considering policy changes that affect voting rights or eligibility, the community should see the exact language in advance, understand the authority being relied on, and have an opportunity to comment meaningfully.
SHCG is making a difference. And contrary to what some have tried to portray, SHCG is not a single-issue group of homeowners. We are focused on transparent governance, fair and reasonable rules, consistent enforcement, homeowner participation, financial accountability, and ensuring the Association follows Arizona law and our governing documents.
Recent examples of progress include the Board allowing homeowner input before voting, paint rules being adjusted to reflect homeowner feedback, and an abatement or hold being placed on fines related to permanent holiday eave lighting pending additional research on legalities. The Treasurer resigned and SHCG has endorsed an exceptionally qualified replacement (endorsement link). Homeowners are getting organized and are able to track HOA issues in one place, compare notes, and avoid being split apart by misinformation or pressure.
You can find copies of the new Amended & Restated Design Guidelines and the Paint Instructions & Colorization Schemes in the Document Library.
Showing up, asking questions, and insisting on fair, consistent governance is how we continue to improve Stetson Hills together. Please stay engaged!
Thank you, Stetson Hills neighbors, the response to the Paint Palette Survey was outstanding. Homeowners showed up in a big way, offering thoughtful feedback on the HOA’s proposed exterior paint palette and related ARC approval process changes.
The final survey results are posted below, and they have been provided to the HOA Board and ARC ahead of the February 24 HOA Board meeting. This feedback represents real homeowner priorities and practical concerns, and it deserves serious attention before any decisions are finalized by the HOA.
Follow links below to view the full final report and new paint schemes:
City Property circulated a posting seeking an Owner to fill the Treasurer position “on the Board of Directors,” stating the person would be appointed to serve the remainder of the term ending May 21, 2027 (see link below). If you’re interested, please apply. We need more reasonable, community minded homeowners stepping into leadership roles, and strong applicants help break the “same small circle” pattern.
This posting also didn’t happen in a vacuum. SHCG and many engaged homeowners have been applying steady pressure for transparency, accountability, and lawful process. Increased homeowner scrutiny drives change, and it’s why we need to stay engaged now and make sure this doesn’t quietly revert to a closed, insider appointment. It’s also a shift in approach: since last May, this Board has appointed two directors without advertising or publicly announcing those vacancies. While the current posting is confusing as written, it is at least a step toward openness and giving homeowners a chance to raise their hand.
The concern is that the notice blends different concepts and creates avoidable confusion. Treasurer is an officer position (like President, Vice President, and Secretary), and officer roles are selected by the Board. If the intent is to appoint a new director to fill a vacant board seat, the Board should say that plainly. If the intent is to appoint a director and then designate that person as Treasurer, that is two separate actions: filling a director vacancy and then electing officers. The May 21, 2027 “term” language also reads more like a director seat timeline than an officer appointment.
If the Board is filling a director vacancy and or selecting an officer, homeowners deserve clarity on exactly what action is being taken, a clearly stated agenda item in advance, and a transparent vote in an open meeting.
If you decide to apply, please follow the application method in the posting. And if you’re comfortable doing so, feel free to copy us or simply let us know you applied (info@stetsonhillscommongood.com). When we know who the homeowner applicants are, we can help elevate strong candidates, share information with neighbors, and build broader community awareness and support behind them.
Homeowners interested in applying for the Treasurer position should email a 100-150 word statement about their qualifications to Community Manager, Toby Metzger: toby.metzger@cityproperty.com
Links:
Last night’s Special Stetson Hills HOA Board Meeting (Zoom) was scheduled to address the proposed short-term Ad Hoc Committee that many homeowners supported as a constructive way to tackle ongoing community concerns (governance, ARC processes, design guideline issues, paint palette concerns, and more).
More than 40 homeowners joined on short notice, and several neighbors spoke respectfully and clearly about the need for transparency, consistency, and genuine homeowner input. Unfortunately, the meeting itself was disorganized and, in our view, the discussion reflected a lack of interest from much of the Board in meaningful homeowner participation. Rather than embracing a short-term committee as a practical pressure-release valve and collaborative path forward, the Board chose not to move forward with the committee as proposed.
The good news is that last night also demonstrated something important: when neighbors show up together, the conversation changes. Momentum is building, and more homeowners are paying attention.
What’s Next!
SHCG is holding in-person organizational meetings with neighbors who selected “I want to help / volunteer” on the SHCG Info Form. We are outlining the key HOA issues, listening to homeowner feedback, aligning on options, and collectively deciding our next moves. Meeting details are sent by email with the next meeting currently scheduled for March 12, 2026 at 6 pm.
If you’re not on the email list yet, or you want to update your selection to “I want to help,” please complete the SHCG Info Form here: https://forms.gle/DdzhWgLdC3bpsZY59
This HOA Board obviously wants homeowners discouraged and quiet. That’s not happening. We hope you’ll agree: we need to keep this movement growing, neighbor by neighbor, until we have the HOA leadership this community deserves.
Links:
SHCG Ad Hoc Committee Proposal Letter (January 28, 2026)
Draft Charter: Governance & Architectural Standards Review Ad Hoc Committee (60-Day)
SHCG Community Update
January 26, 2026
Meeting with HOA President and ARC Chair - Key Takeaways
(Click on image above)
HOA Regular Board Meeting January 27, 2026 Agenda
(Click on image above)
SHCG Recap of the January 27, 2026 HOA Board Meeting
(Click on image above)
SHCG Letter to HOA Board Proposing the Creation of an Ad Hoc Committee
January 28, 2026
(Click on image above)
SHCG Proposed Ad Hoc Committee DRAFT Charter
January 28, 2026
(Click on image above)
SHCG Preliminary Paint Palette Survey Results
Feb 15, 2026
(Click on image above)
SHCG FINAL Paint Palette Survey Results
Feb 23, 2026
(Click on image above)
Coming Soon
Our goal is to document recurring patterns, explain why these issues matter, and advocate for clear, consistent, and reasonable standards that reflect homeowner expectations, protect property rights, and reduce unnecessary conflict.
If you have experienced issues involving violations, ARC decisions, meeting access, inconsistent enforcement, unclear standards, or other governance concerns, we want to hear from you. First hand homeowner accounts help identify patterns and verify facts. You can share information in whatever way you are comfortable, and you may request that your story remain anonymous.
You can share your experience publicly in our Nextdoor and Facebook groups, submit it privately through our Input & Updates Form or by emailing info@stetsonhillscommongood.com, so our volunteer team can track trends and keep you informed.
This website is a work in progress. SHCG is operated by volunteer neighbors who are doing our best, while balancing jobs, families, and everyday life, to build the site, verify information, and keep the community informed. We appreciate your patience as we continue organizing materials and improving the site over time.